Costs & pricing

Generative engine optimization services: what arrives on the first of the month.

There are three ways to buy this work — a retainer, a tool, or a closed-loop product — and vendors blur them on purpose. Side by side on the only axis that matters: who writes, who publishes, who proves it worked, and what it costs, with every band sourced and verified August 2026.

Updated 2026-10-02 · Prices and data verified 2026-08-11

Search for generative engine optimization services and you will get agencies, software, and a few things in between, all using the same words for different products. The way through is to stop asking what a vendor calls itself and ask what arrives on the first of the month: a report and a call, a dashboard refresh, or a set of changes that were drafted, approved, published and re-measured. Those are three different purchases. GEO services, honestly compared, is that table — and then the questions that separate a provider doing the work from one selling the vocabulary.

The three purchases, side by side

What arrives on the first of the month

A retainer

A report, a call, and whatever the team shipped — pages, schema, outreach — depending on the retainer's scope.

A tool

A dashboard refresh: who the engines named, on your question set.

A closed loop

Scan results, plus the drafts the system prepared and you approved, plus whether the answer moved.

Who does the writing

A retainer

The agency's writers, at the retainer's cadence.

A tool

You, or nobody.

A closed loop

The system drafts; a person approves before anything publishes.

Who publishes

A retainer

Usually the agency, if it has CMS access; otherwise you, from their drafts.

A tool

You.

A closed loop

Pulled to WordPress automatically after approval; paste-ready elsewhere.

Who proves it worked

A retainer

The report — ask what it measures and whether it shows the answers themselves.

A tool

The dashboard — a score, sometimes the answers.

A closed loop

Re-scans on the same questions, with the dated change and the dated citation side by side.

Published price band

A retainer

$2,000–6,000/month for a boutique retainer (verified August 2026); mid-market bands could not be verified and are not stated.

A tool

$29–495/month, engines and prompts metered.

A closed loop

$149–549/month here, with a 7-day trial.

Best when

A retainer

You want strategy and humans in the loop, have budget for both, and can hold a vendor to a measured report.

A tool

You have a writer and a publishing process and only lack the measurement.

A closed loop

You have neither a writer nor a process and one approver who can press a button.

Price bands from lib/seo/market-data.ts AGENCY_RETAINER and TOOL_PRICE_BAND and lib/pricing.ts PLANS (verified August 2026). A mid-market retainer band failed verification and is deliberately absent. The deliverable rows are our description of what each model can structurally provide.

What the work is, whichever way you buy it

The paper that coined the term tested nothing but content changes and found that pages carrying quotations, statistics and citations were drawn into answers more, while keyword stuffing scored below the baseline. That is worth holding onto when a proposal arrives, because it means the deliverable — under any name — is pages that contain evidence and are live where a machine can read them, plus the measurement that shows whether an answer changed. A service that hands over a strategy deck and a score has delivered neither. The paper is read directly on its own page.

What a retainer should contain, in writing

  • A fixed question set. The buyer questions the engines will be asked about you — the list, not a keyword strategy.
  • A named engine set, and how each is read: live interface, API, or a model asked what it believes. Those are different measurements.
  • A publishing commitment. Pages or fixes per month, and who holds CMS access. A draft nobody publishes has no visibility.
  • A measurement clause. The same questions re-asked on a schedule, with the answers shown. A score alone is a number you cannot check.

Three questions that expose a vendor selling vocabulary

Ask them of an agency, a tool, or us, and ignore the acronym on the proposal.

  • Which questions will you ask the engines about my business — can I see the list?
  • Which engines, and how do you read each one?
  • Will I see the actual answers each month, or only a number?

A provider who answers all three plainly is doing the work. One who answers with a methodology deck is selling the word. Neither the name AEO nor the name GEO tells you which you are talking to.

When each is the right buy

Yes

A retainer, when strategy is the missing piece: a positioning problem, a multi-market governance problem, a category where the questions themselves are unclear. Humans are good at those. Hold the retainer to the four items above.

Yes

A tool, when you already have a writer and a publishing process and lack only the measurement. Buy the measurement and keep the writer.

It depends

A closed loop, when you have neither a writer nor a process and one person who can approve a draft. That is what we sell, from $149/month with a 7-day trial; the offer itself, and seven questions to ask before signing, are on the services page. If you have a review board rather than one approver, it is the wrong shape, and the enterprise page says so.

The line item every proposal leaves out

Whichever you buy, the work never finishes, because the engines never settle: 40–60% of the sources AI cites change every month (eMarketer, 2026). A proposal with an end date is describing a project; the work is a standing function. Price it as one.

08 · FAQ

The service questions, sourced.

What do generative engine optimization services actually include?
It depends entirely on which of three things you are buying, and vendors blur them. A retainer buys people: strategy, writing, publishing where they have access, and a monthly report. A tool buys measurement: a dashboard of who the engines named on your question set, with the writing and publishing left to you. A closed-loop product buys the sequence: scans, drafted fixes, approval, publishing, and re-measurement. The table on this page puts all three side by side on the only axis that matters — what arrives on the first of the month.
How much do GEO services cost?
Three bands, all sourced. Boutique agency retainers run $2,000–6,000/month (verified August 2026); a mid-market band exists in the market but failed our verification, so this page does not state one. Tools run $29–495/month with engines and prompts metered. Our own closed-loop product runs $149–549/month with a 7-day trial. The full cost page, with every source and the arithmetic, is linked below.
What should a GEO retainer contain?
Four things, in writing. A fixed question set — the actual buyer questions the engines will be asked about you, not keywords. A named engine set. A publishing commitment — how many pages or fixes per month, and who has CMS access. And a measurement clause: the same questions re-asked on a schedule, with the answers shown, not only a score. A retainer missing any of the four is a retainer whose report you cannot check.
How do I tell a real GEO provider from one selling the vocabulary?
Ask three questions and ignore the acronym on the proposal. Which questions will you ask the engines about my business, and can I see the list? Which engines, and how do you read each one — live interface, API, or asking a model what it believes? Will I see the actual answers each month, or a number derived from them? A provider who answers all three plainly is doing the work under whatever name; one who answers with a methodology deck is selling the word.
When does a retainer genuinely beat a tool or a product?
When strategy is the missing piece rather than execution: a brand with a positioning problem, a multi-market company with a governance problem, a category where the questions themselves are unclear. Humans are good at those and software is not. When the missing piece is execution — pages that do not exist, schema that does not match, a crawler that is blocked — a retainer is an expensive way to buy what a product does on a schedule. The honest test is to name the missing piece before you name the vendor.
How long before a service shows results?
No honest provider gives a date, and one that does should worry you. For pages that do get cited, practitioner testing across 2026 found a median of about 6.8 days to a first ChatGPT citation once indexed, with roughly 42% cited within 30 days (Semrush / practitioner testing, 2026); Bing standing moves faster and is the early indicator, since roughly 87% of ChatGPT's citations match Bing's top results (Seer Interactive, 2026) — a measured correlation, not a mechanism OpenAI documents. And 40–60% of the sources AI cites change every month (eMarketer, 2026), which is why any of the three models is a standing arrangement rather than a project.

Before you retain anyone, see what the engines say now.

Ten buyer questions across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity, 30 live answers in about two minutes, three shown word for word. It tells you which of the three you actually need. Just an email, no account, no card.

This is a live test: we ask ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity what your customers ask and record who gets recommended. Your results are on screen in about two minutes, and we email you a link to the report when the scan is done. We may also send you our newsletter about AI search; every issue has a one-click unsubscribe.

Free · No account · No card · About two minutes

Free audit first: see exactly where you stand before paying anything. 7-day trial, no card.